Search results

  1. Banta

    Annihilation of the Rigid Airship Industry

    I'm not sure that airships would have required a radically different weather pattern to be viable. Here's what a modern airship service claims: Skyship Services, Inc. 100 knots is 115 mph, so those are some pretty serious winds. It's also worth mentioning that it isn't like airplanes do not take...
  2. Banta

    Book | 1770: Atlantis subdivided into three more, America, Sebastia, and Hyperborea

    Sebastia caught my eye too, I was completely unfamiliar. The top result is interesting enough (though obviously not what the author is referencing): The mosque is very notable: Nabi Yahya Mosque - Wikipedia If you have any sort of knowledge of Gnosticism, the mystery schools, etc, these are...
  3. Banta

    Willamette Meteorite: why, and what is it?

    Really shows where we are as a society that speculating that an object could be the remains of an earlier refining process right here on Earth is "crazy" but declaring that it must have travelled trillions of miles over millions of years from points unknown in the sky is rationally accepted.
  4. Banta

    Was previous Jerusalem located in England?

    Oh the holy lands, how little we really have to go on. Fomenko thought a lot took place in Italy. I'm digging this England idea though ... immediately I thought of this rather obvious comparison: King Arthur Was the Biblical Jesus. I personally can't keep straight who should be mythological and...
  5. Banta

    Book | The New Chronology by Fomenko and Nosovskiy

    Just wanted to say, if you're on this site, this should be required reading. At least required skimming, they get pretty dense and mathematical modeling like this has obvious limitations. But the correlations are fascinating and one should easily be able to walk away understanding that our...
  6. Banta

    Hyperborea: what if it still exists?

    Just a quick comment for now, it would be an amazing project to try and correlate temperatures (and eventually sunrise/sunset times) and make a new latitude/longitude type system. The "Vladivostok - Anchorage" comparison reminds me of the difference between my location in the northeast of the...
  7. Banta

    1770s: Seattle, Tsunami, Earthquakes, Lake Washington and Underwater Forests

    Little, you mean, in the sense that War and Peace was a bathroom novella...
  8. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    First of all, jd is amazing, as always. There's a lot to digest in this post and I always appreciate the healthy back and forth. Just had to address this. Let's pull up the 1905 picture again: The bottomline to me here is that that tree on the right side of the building, at the very least...
  9. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    And that is what I'm starting to think is the real riddle here (and with many other "quick build" projects), more than the actual structure and even the architects. There's an overall sense in the alternative history community (thanks to "mudflood" oversaturation, pun intended) that all of these...
  10. Banta

    1770s: Seattle, Tsunami, Earthquakes, Lake Washington and Underwater Forests

    There are so many problems with carbon dating that anyone who accepts it uncritically literally has a religious belief. From very suspect calibration methods (look up "continuous tree-ring sequences") to wildly variant results: How Accurate is Carbon Dating? And something I never really hear...
  11. Banta

    1892 Pioneer Building in Seattle: how and when was it built?

    Ok. Then my failure is complete! :)
  12. Banta

    1892 Pioneer Building in Seattle: how and when was it built?

    Agreed. It was the tallest building in Seattle until the Hoge building in 1911. Yet the library that supposedly hadn't even started construction gets a number.
  13. Banta

    1892 Pioneer Building in Seattle: how and when was it built?

    Yeah, I think I got ahead of myself. It's the Alaska building, completed 1904. Alaska Building
  14. Banta

    1892 Pioneer Building in Seattle: how and when was it built?

    So, not strictly about the Pioneer Building, but since this thread is sort of about the whole area now, I just have to show you this. From the 1904 Bird’s Eye View KD posted in the other thread: #59 is the Pioneer Building. Across the street, you can see a very tall and suspiciously unlabeled...
  15. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    Glad you wondered, because it allows me to point out this area:
  16. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    Kinda, but not really?
  17. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    And indistinguishable from how a building that's having its facade redone would look. But that's crazy talk, of course. Then again, no crazier than building a new structure right next to a tree. I mean, the one on the right is touching it, for Chief Seattle's sake! Great work by jd in this...
  18. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    Not finding anything. You can find pictures of gentleman named Peter Joseph Weber who lived before and after him, but none match up with his birth and death. I'd be interested to read this, but the online copy seems to be defunct: Peter J. Weber papers, 1888-ca. 1945. (Archival material, 1893)...
  19. Banta

    1906: Seattle Central Library. Demolished in 1957.

    Carnegie turns up over and over again in this tale of our stolen history. Not surprising I guess. In 100 years, they'll probably say the same thing about Bill Gates. Not sure who I mean by "they" ... let's be optimistic and say it's our descendants that finally sorted out this mess we call...
  20. Banta

    Seattle regrading or unearthing? Which one was it?

    Found the alleged photos of the Occidental Building on this site and it looks like a great resource. Regrading photos, Alaska Yukon Pacific Exposition*, and more: Otto Theodore (O.T.) Frasch - Seattle Photographer *Something weird going on there too, most of the pictures are supposed to be...
Back
Top