At this point I simply wanted to ask one question:
- In your opinion, what mechanism (or mechanisms) of destruction could cause the observed damages?
If that image is an authentic photograph of the actual full-size city which they say it is, then:
an energy beam. And if it was an energy beam, then it was either controlled by a conscious being or it was natural like lightning.
If we are wrong in our up-to-now assumption of that image being a photo of reality, then the answer is:
hands. Meaning, all images of destruction could have been caused by hands which made a mere mini-model and/or CGI.
Related Question:
"What caused steel beams to fly so far away from the towers, as if light-as-aluminum, and then dissolve while falling?"
Related Answer:
"We were fooled by a pre-prepared movie with flaws: the 'lightness' is due to mini-model, the 'dissolving' is due to CGI."
But, but,
these images are from
the official archives: how could they forge fake images back then which appear real?
Well, perhaps they have had such fakery-technology even then, or, perhaps the archive-insertion happened recently.
(Or,
it is indeed
possible they have had this supposed Directed Energy Weapon beam technology,
both then and now.)
(Still, be careful about this whole 'they have an extremely big stick' idea as all their atomic-bomb images were faked.)
When critically investigating 'Hawaii destruction footage' there's evidence (aluminum license plates gone, etc) of CGI.
I was fooled by the Dustified-by-DEW idea but all such "destruction evidence" became meaningless since proven fake.
(And yes, all the official 'live' broadcasts, and matching 'amateur additions', are all proven fake by the 4-meter 'victim').
So I no longer believe "they control DEW beams", instead I think they show us 'DEW Evidence' images: yet set plain fires. So, when looking at the "official & amateur" images (of city events, new and old, fire & war events) I now think
all faked. They simply do land-grabs by: writing an official story (yet using plain fire and bombs) while adding in fake DEW-images. Yes, maybe they have successfully fooled me into being an evangelist for this idea of "DEW 'evidence' is all faked images." Or maybe they are simply successfully fooling you into holding on to the idea of "They have Nukes & DEW: very big sticks!"
Anyway, I think my most recent post (on the Model thread) proves (to me)
NATURAL energy/plasma/lightning beams exist.
In summary, KD: I currently think Natural Zapping happened randomly everywhere, and huge land-grabs happened, simple.
Partially-Zapped Derawar proves bricks turn to mud/dirt, thus explaining: Fully-Zapped Grand Canyon plus Sahara Desert. Meaning as Jon Levi theorized in that video with Derawar bricks as evidence:
Grand Canyon was bricks,
Sahara was bricks. I simply have taken his conclusion one step further: I think the Partial Zapping at Derawar PROVES it is Random & Natural.
Unrelated to such Natural Zapping, is the fact the rulers often write fake stories, and insert fake images, to do land grabs. They showed fake plane/victim images for the masses to get support for a war/land-grab (and added in 'DEW' for us few). They started fires in California/Hawaii for evacuation & land-grab (and again, added 'DEW' images for us to assume real). If their Nuke & DEW images were real, then: be afraid, be very afraid of them, and give the government mafia their tribute. If their Nuke & DEW images are fake, then: no need to fear and pay them so much. Just hope Nature doesn't zap your city. And no, I do NOT think we need to pay the government mafia to "save us from Nature". I'm NOT pushing the Climate Hoax. I'm simply pointing out: stop assuming images are real. Assuming images are real leads to false assumptions based on CGI.
If you go to a place, and see evidence of man-controlled-energy-beam-destruction, then bring us there. Images are fake.
EDIT: Also, to go back to your original question KD, if the images are authentic, here's a simple probable explanation:
Step #1: Start fires (gasoline + matches). Step #2: Evacuate everyone away. Step #3: Dynamite. Lots of it.
EDIT 2: If one says: "But the images don't look like dynamite damage." Then I'll say, "Step #4: all images were faked."
EDIT 3: "But how do we explain the destruction in Hawaii? The engines are missing!" The problem is starting loaded questions with the assumption included that the Hawaii images (and collection of images which are called movies or videos) are authentic in the first place. Just as the 'Mini-Nuke Evidence' images and 'DEW evidence' images in the 9/11 movie don't prove the existence of DEW, so too, here in the case of Hawaii. MM explains:
"The DEW-heads will say the lack of an engine is proof of DEWs, but they never explain how this tech targets engine metal and leaves other metal alone. It melts the engine right out of the chassis, but leaves the chassis? Plus, they forgot to CGI in some silver melted lines of metal pouring out of most of these cars, showing us how the metal was melted out, running in rivers. I guess DEWs now aerosol engine metals, or turn them to flour. But you don't need DEWs to explain why these cars don't have engines: they don't have engines because the engines were sold by the junkyards before these wrecks were fed into the computer or hauled to some set. Lazy compositing."
EDIT 4: KD, please forgive me (and BusyBaci, the first person to answer) for pointing out the question was slightly loaded. Here is SimonShack
posing almost the exact same question as you asked here, perhaps he is poking fun at this very thread:
*
EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COLLAPSE: WHAT CAUSED IT?
Alright, folks - so just for fun let me ask everyone how they think that the Empire State Building was 'brought down' in 1996:
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
The ESB collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
Next, how do you think that the WTC towers were brought down on September 11, 2001?
The WTC collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
CGI collapse footage - Page 35 - Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception
*************************************************************
So a different question is:
What fakery techniques were used in fire images
then, or, how easy is it to
archive-insert later?
By the way, I get it, you aren't asking the above question now,
you posted it 3 years ago, BusyBaci just bumped it now.
Edit 5: My long answer is correcting your assumption fire images (Chicage, and now Maui) are "real" and thus prove "DEW".
I'll finish my attempt to stop such naive assumptions, by sharing more words from Simon Shack bringing us back to Reality:
"No covert military operation would rely on any sort of novel, untested 'sci-fi' weapons to bring down skyscrapers in Manhattan. NOTHING is left to chance in the military sphere; only the most tested and dependable explosives would thus have been chosen – such as those used reliably and unfailingly every day around the world to bring down old buildings with."
and
"...'DEW' and 'NUKE' weapons are no more than scare-mongering make-believe propaganda contrivances used for mass control. The recently-revived “DEW” fearporn (
see Maui events) was started years ago by a woman named Judy Wood, a popular 9/11 gatekeeper whose specific role is / was to try and ‘justify’ the bogus 9/11 imagery, what with the apparent mid-air ‘dustification’ of the Twin Towers. Her ‘key psyop assignment’ is to try and convince people that magic DEW weapons from space actually exist - and therefore, that the absurd / unphysical WTC collapse videos may actually be legit / authentic."
And finally, KD, the Chicago images we look at now (like at the top of this thread) might be different than the originals. Meaning, an absolutely undeniable fact is the original broadcast on 9/11 differs vastly from the later "amateur" inserts:
You can see the original Low-Quality hazy-day image-fakery they showed in the Original Broadcast on NBC at 9:59 AM:
But NBC/ABC/CBS/FOX/CNN cameras must have all been cheap, because: in 2010 "amateur" versions were inserted:
So, the
2001/9/11 Live Broadcast version is much lower quality than
"NIST-FOIA CUMULUS archive" released in 2010.
In a similar way, KD, can you consider the idea:
perhaps "old fire images" we see today are different from
the originals?
Edit 6: I'm now thinking perhaps it went like this: Natural Zaps from the sky came at some point in time, which turned bricks to dirt/sand (which later combined with a flood which led to mud.) Then, either immediately after, or a long time after, who knows which, the richest of the survivors started grabbing control of the ruins, ruins which included a mixture of perfectly fine buildings, totally turned-to-dust buildings, and partially-destroyed partially-fine combination buildings. Then, while grabbing control of these ruins, the rich created the "fire story" for each of these cities, and attached to the official "fire" stories various official images (some could be real, some could be fake, some a combination, and some - or all - of the images we see today in the archives might even be more-recently-updated-forgeries inserted into the archives at later dates, with better forgeries of course becoming possible over the decades and centuries after the initial image dissemination).
Within the story writing, and the image fakeries, one goal of the rich was to claim "they" built the buildings they found, which were actually built long before their birth, so the rich claimed they "newly founded" such buildings (thus cleverly implying they built them, while keeping in their back-pocket the ability to back-pedal if needed, since if they were ever brought before a judge their lawyers could easily use the defense of "My client clearly wrote 'founded', which means the buildings were found, so my client cannot be convicted of fraud, it's not my client's fault people then assumed newly founded meant newly built by my client. The people voluntarily agreed to my client owning all the buildings and all the land everywhere, and my client and his family have been the legal caretakers and thus owners ever since.").
Anyway, instead of getting bogged down in the details, the main point I'm making now is: from JonLevi, last week, as mentioned, I learned Natural Zaps can destroy bricks, melting them into what then turns to sand or mud (depending on the subsequent dryness or wetness of the area). And now today, from my starting to look through ReverendALC's posts with proper respect and open-mindedness, this idea which he proposed now seems very logical to me, which he posted in the "How did they alter our history?" thread, to answer that particular question:
To circle back to the original question a little bit… I just had an interesting thought:
We are all attempting to reconcile history, with a noble purpose in the pursuit of knowledge. We have numerous tools at our disposal.
As previously suggested, what if there was an ELE which nearly extinguished civilization and recorded history with it? What if, in the noble pursuit of knowledge, our ancient scholars attempted to piece together history as well as they could, with their far more limited means?
I guess the bush that I’m beating around is maybe this isn’t as nefarious as it seems; it’s just a poorly done job due to limited means and an inordinate amount of speculation?
That being said, there are some definitely nefarious factors at play. Maybe the ignorance of academia was co-opted by those who knew better and capitalized on the opportunity?