Bizarre transformation of the North American Continent: 16th through 19th centuries

I cannot believe the balls of these quackademics to discredit these ancient pioneers of map making by calling their work fictional. As an amateur map researcher i have studied many old and new maps and even though their degree accuracy was a bit off they still made these fantastic maps with mathematical calculations only. They based them on travel logs, captain's journals, their own travels and older sources. And look how accurate they are. If you try to find a feature from these old maps using longitudinal grids and superimpose them on new maps you can find those objects. Pretty accurate i would say. It is an affront to hard working cartographers to call their work fictional.

As for the NA map, you can see their process of exploration through various iterations of the map, because in their 16th century they had only explored the east and center of America, but the west side was still unknown. During their 18th century they had already mapped out most of it including the West Sea. Many people will probably not believe there was a sea there merely 300 years ago, but studying old and new maps looking for traces of catastrophy i have discovered that this sea was indeed real. Better yet i have discovered traces of its flooding and sediments as it traveled south. You see, from topographical studies i have determined that the cataclysm was in the form of a massive shockwave with a point of origin in the north, that traveled all around the planet and dissipated at the south pole. The shockwave pushed all global waters in a southward motion, with huge tidal waves flooding lands, razing everything and spilling into the oceans. We see traces of this disaster especially in the northern hemisphere, but some traces of it are found in the southern one too.
As a result of the shockwave, the north sea invaded northern Europe, Siberia and Tartaria, North America was flooded from the north, Hudson bay spilled into the great lakes which in turn spilled south into the Golf of Mexico and the Mediteranean Sea washed away the jungles of North Africa and Arabian peninsula and left a trail of sand and clay in its wake. If you look carefully on google earth and examine all the northern beaches in the world you will see traces of sand and mud deposits on them as well as huge flood scars. This is what truly ended the so called tartarian age. Where the ice caps came from i have no idea... Yet.

The West Sea existed in the great valley of British Columbia, between the two mountain chains and stretched all the way south over the Washington state. When the shockwave hit, the sea spilled over Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, California, Arizona, and poured into the Pacific in the south-west. The Nevada and Arizona deserts were caused by the flooding and sand deposits of this sea. The salt lakes of Utah are puddle remnants of this great sea. Also you can see the spill way of the Great Lakes, going south through Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri, Arkansaw, Mississippi and Louisiana, coming to rest in the Gulf of Mexico. The evidence is right there in our aerial photography maps.
The reason the californian cities were spared is because the Sierra Nevada Mountains acted as a barrier from the spilling sea. San Francisco was intact after the cataclysm, as early 19th century photographs show.
I have included a study of how i think the flood waters moved across the land during the cataclysm.
Regarding the discrepancies in the map quality and information, i think that the elites have made a cut in the historic record at the end of their 18th century and appended our "19th century" upon that. As you can see in this article as well, 18th century maps have the West Sea, 19th century maps dont, and have other discrepancies too. I think we are missing about 300 years of history, that was the tartarian industrial evolution and the disaster happened sometime in OUR so called 18th century.


These old maps are the biggest treasures of knowledge that humanity has left of the old world. We must save them with care!

@Ancient Soul, I think you might find this interesting.

• 1770s: Seattle, Tsunami, Earthquakes, Lake Washington and Underwater Forests

I am not sure if this was posted here earlier but this site has a lot of research about California being an island.

I'm quoting the synopsis from this website

• California As An Island

The California as an island map gives us a snapshot of the Western United States and Mexico toward the beginning of the ice age. The Grand Canyon has not yet formed, and the uplift of the Western states has not begun. Only two major western mountain ranges have formed: The Rockies and the Wasatch range. The Sierra Nevada range and the coastal range do not appear on the map, and in light of the accuracy of the map in general, we can be fairly confident that this is because they were not yet there. Why is this important to young earth creationist? This is the smoking gun that shows that the Atlantic Rift, the Sierra Nevadas and Coastal Range, the Western States uplift, and the Grand Canyon, were formed, not millions of years ago, but in historical times. Most important is that the map stands on its own. Creationists cannot be accused of manufacturing it because it has been around for over four hundred years and is based on sources obviously thousands of years old. Evolutionists have no way to respond to this except to ignore it or call it a myth. But the accuracy of the map and the details it reveals testify to its validity.

There is also a smaller post scriptum about the location of atlantis on the bottom of California As An Island, again i'm quoting the first paragraph here:

Post Script - Another Island Deemed to be Mythological
The suggestion that Atlantis was an actual historical event will cause academia to smirk and roll their eyes. However, while studying the Pacific Ocean for California as an island, I began to wonder if we could determine the location of Atlantis in the Atlantic ocean. As it turns out, we can. Most of what we know about Atlantis comes from Plato, who describes it in much detail in two plays: "Timaeus" and "Critias". From the Wikipedia section on Critias we learn: "The Egyptians, Plato asserted, described Atlantis as an island comprising mostly mountains in the northern portions and along the shore, and encompassing a great plain of an oblong shape in the south "extending in one direction three thousand stadia [about 555 km; 345 mi], but across the center inland it was two thousand stadia [about 370 km; 230 mi]." Fifty stadia [9 km; 6 mi] from the coast was a mountain that was low on all sides ... broke it off all round about ... the central island itself was five stades in diameter [about 0.92 km; 0.57 mi]."

And we have an email sent to youtuber JonLevi talking about people fighting giants from islands next to California "88 years after america was made famous" which you can see for yourself